Report in 24h · From $49 · No traffic needed

Your visitors already know why they're not buying. Now you will too.

You're spending on traffic. Something on your page is stopping the sale. You don't know what. Here's a ranked list of exactly what it is, specific enough to hand to your developer with no briefing needed.

Pick your tier. Provide your URL. Get your report.

BuyerEyes Report
Local marketing agency
74
out of 100
Visual Design
6.5
Copy & Messaging
8.4
CTA Effectiveness
5.8
Trust & Credibility
6.2
Technical
8.1
Persona Intent
7.4
Conflict detected
"Copy 8.4 vs Visual 6.5. Messaging does the heavy lifting while design underperforms."
How certain
Copy 8.4 — strong finding, act on it. Visual 6.5 — worth investigating further before changing.

How much is your conversion rate costing you right now?

Move the sliders. See your number.

Monthly visitors 10k
500100,000
Current conversion rate 2.0%
0.5%5.0%
Average order value $75
$10$500
Now (2.0% CR) $15,000 /mo
After (2.5% CR) $18,750 /mo
+$3,750
difference per month
That's $45,000 per year

The last team that tried to figure this out themselves spent 3 months on A/B tests and moved CR from 1.2% to 1.21%.
Get your report and unblock that improvement

From URL to actionable report in 3 steps

01

Tell us what to look at

Buyer View: one page URL. No account, no setup, no traffic needed.

Buyer Click: your landing page + up to 3 ad sets (image, copy, headline). We score the ads and check if your page delivers what they promised.

Buyer Journey: your entry URL + ad sets. We trace the full path your buyers take from ad to checkout.

All tiers: add one sentence about your audience and we generate buyer personas to match.

02

Buyers browse your site

Each persona evaluates your page independently — the way a real prospect would. Then they argue. High scores get challenged for hidden weaknesses. Low scores get defended for overlooked strengths. What survives is what actually matters for your conversion rate.

For Buyer Click and Buyer Journey, we also score your ad creatives against your landing pages: what buyers were promised vs. what they found.

03

Get a report you can act on

A plain-language summary tells you what works, what to fix first, and how your visitors reacted — written for someone who runs a business, not a testing lab.

Behind it: the full technical analysis with specific scores for every area of your page, plus effort-tagged recommendations your developer can start on immediately.

Why you can trust these numbers and act on them

Standard AI audits are not grounded in reality, facts, or best practices. This approach has been scientifically proven to match human experts only 26-39% of the time. 2 to 4 out of 10. BuyerEyes focuses on your buyer perspectives and expert judgment based on proven best practices.

150

Scored against real examples, not AI guesswork

Your score isn't a number an AI made up. The system describes your page the way your customers would — in plain language. Then it compares that description against 150 real examples of what good and bad actually look like. Your customers' eyes. Not an AI's guess. Full methodology

3

3 rounds where the system questions itself

The system questions itself. Each buyer provides 2 opinions for each page. Every score above 7.0 gets challenged for hidden weaknesses. Every score below 4.0 gets defended for overlooked strengths. You get a finding that went through an x-ray of multiple buyers.

29

Specific enough to hand to your developer

Every finding comes with a reason. "Your buy button is hard to find on mobile" — here's why and what to change. "Your headline works" — here's what not to break. Your developer or designer knows exactly where to go. No briefing needed.

±

Every finding tells you whether to act or look closer

Some findings are certain: "Fix this now." Others need a second look: "This might be a problem — verify before changing." The report is honest about what it knows and what needs more investigation. It never invents a recommendation to fill a gap.

Every page is tested against 6 questions your buyer actually asks:

  • Who is this for?
  • What do I get?
  • Why should I believe you?
  • When do I get it?
  • Where do I go next?
  • How does it work?

And a harder test: does any element on the page say something no buyer ever wanted to read?

"I always wanted to read about how long it took you to come up with the product name."

...said no buyer ever.

Read the full methodology: how we score, how reviewers challenge each other, and how we prevent bias

Six areas. Each one that stands between your visitor and your checkout.

Your report covers six areas that decide whether a visitor buys or leaves. Each one comes with specific findings your team can fix — and the report tells you which fixes matter most.

Visual design

Is your page clear at a glance, or do visitors work to understand it?

Hierarchy, CTA prominence, mobile coherence, brand consistency
"Everything is exactly where I'd expect it and the hierarchy makes the page almost effortless to scan."

Copy & messaging

Does your copy speak to buyers, or talk about yourself?

5-second test, clarity of what's in it for the buyer, benefit-to-feature ratio, scannability
"Every word earns its place. The headline tells me what this is and why it matters to someone like me."

CTA effectiveness

Are your buttons working as hard as the rest of your page?

CTA clarity, visual hierarchy, positioning, buying stage alignment, microcopy
"Every button told me exactly what I would get. The primary action was crystal clear and I felt zero hesitation about clicking."

Trust & credibility

Would a stranger trust your page enough to enter payment details?

Social proof specificity, pricing transparency, dark pattern detection
"The site behaves like a mensch. It clearly prioritizes my interests alongside their business goals."

Technical experience

Does your technology help buyers, or get in their way?

Load time, layout shift, mobile friction, form quality, accessibility
"The technology is invisible, which is exactly how it should be."

Purchase intent

Would real buyers actually buy from your page?

Value equation, risk perception, social validation needs, commitment readiness
"Not buying actually feels like the bigger risk because I'd miss out on something that seems like a sure thing."
Scoring method reaches 90% agreement with human CRO experts · Visual attention map based on real eye-tracking data · Full details

What a BuyerEyes audit actually looks like

Scores and insights from 4 real audits. Each report surfaces the specific conflict between what a website does well and what holds it back.

phone screen
above the fold below the fold
Visual attention heatmap of BuyerEyes.ai homepage showing hotspots on headline, CTA button and pricing section above the fold
phone screen
below the fold

Where do visitors actually look?

59% predicted attention above the fold
78% match with real eye-tracking studies

Every report includes a visual attention heatmap generated from a single screenshot. No traffic required, no panel recruitment. Hotjar needs 2,000 visits to show you a heatmap. All BuyerEyes needs is a screenshot, taken and analyzed automatically.

Validated on 640 web pages against real eye-tracking data. Shows whether your hero, CTA, and key messaging sit inside the attention hotspots or get ignored.

Attention prediction trained on 1,585 real web pages · Research details
See how BuyerEyes compares to Hotjar, VWO, and other tools
Fitness / Personal Training
68 / 100
Visual
6.8
Copy
8.0
Trust
6.8
Technical
5.8
Persona Avg
7.0
"Leaky bucket": strong copy undermined by technical friction

A differentiated value proposition targeting desk workers and injury recovery. The site rejected the typical gym-bro culture for a "movement craftsman" persona. Copy scored 8.0 with highly effective messaging.

But the technical layer told a different story. Load times and form friction created a gap between what the page promised and how it felt to use.

Conflict detected
Copy 8.0 vs Technical 5.8. Great content being undermined by technical friction.

Top recommendations

  • Low effort Fix hero headline to immediately communicate the desk-to-movement value proposition
  • Low effort Clean up duplicate review content that dilutes social proof
  • Medium effort Reduce form friction to match the quality of the copy
AI buyer "Tomek the Remote Developer", scored 4.0 / 5.0
The desk-to-movement messaging was a direct hit. This persona saw the service as a solution to a problem they think about daily.
Local Business Marketing
74 / 100
Visual
6.5
Copy
8.4
Trust
6.2
Technical
8.1
Persona Avg
7.4
Exceptional copy-market fit with a trust gap from unverifiable claims

A direct-response lead-gen page using the PAS framework. The copy targeted a specific pain point: businesses experiencing a "referral drought." Messaging scored 8.4, the highest in our sample.

The gap appeared in trust signals. Claims about a portal network lacked verification, and the brand felt impersonal despite strong messaging.

Conflict detected
Copy 8.4 vs Visual 6.5. Messaging does the heavy lifting while design underperforms.

Top recommendations

  • Medium effort Verify portal network claims with concrete data or remove them
  • Low effort Optimize hero CTA prominence to match the quality of surrounding copy
  • Medium effort Humanize the brand with team photos or founder story
AI buyer "Tomasz the Innovator", scored 4.1 / 5.0
Viewed the service as a hack to bypass expensive Google Ads. The PAS framing of referral drought hit a nerve.
International Veterinary Care
55 / 100
Visual
3.9
Copy
7.5
Trust
6.1
Technical
5.7
Persona Avg
4.8
Compelling value proposition buried by poor visual hierarchy

Vetresor offers veterinary care in Poland for Swedish pet owners, with savings around 80%. A strong message backed by the founder's personal story. But the page didn't let that story breathe.

An oversized logo consumed the viewport. CTAs were buried below the fold. The form had usability issues that created friction at the exact moment trust was needed most.

Conflict detected
Copy 7.5 vs Visual 3.9. Great story, poor delivery.

Top recommendations

  • Low effort Fix form usability to reduce abandonment at the conversion point
  • Medium effort Optimize hero hierarchy: reduce logo size, move CTA above the fold
  • Medium effort Bridge credibility gap by naming partner clinics and surgeon credentials
AI buyer "Elin the Quality Seeker", scored 2.7 / 5.0
Needs specific surgeon credentials before trusting her pet's health to a service abroad. The 80% savings message wasn't enough without proof of quality.
B2B AI Education
68 / 100
Visual
6.8
Copy
7.8
Trust
6.7
Technical
6.0
Persona Avg
6.2
Professional authority with paid programs buried in FAQ

A clean B2B lead-gen page leveraging a strong founder brand. The "Day in the Life" schedule was a standout: it demystified AI adoption by showing concrete daily usage instead of abstract promises.

The report flagged a monetization gap. Paid programs were hidden inside the FAQ section, invisible to buyers who were ready to spend. Mobile form friction added unnecessary resistance to the free starter flow.

Conflict detected
Visual praised text-based utility vs Copy criticized lack of hero image.

Top recommendations

  • Low effort Fix mobile form friction to reduce drop-off on the free starter kit signup
  • Medium effort Ground social proof with real names and outcomes instead of anonymous metrics
  • Medium effort Surface paid programs from FAQ into a dedicated pricing or programs section
AI buyer "First-Time Visitor", scored 3.5 / 5.0
The low-friction free starter kit drove high initial conversion intent, but the visitor had no idea paid programs existed.
Included in every audit

Your review section: trust signal or red flag?

BuyerEyes checks your review section not just for presence, but for signs that something looks off: did all the reviews arrive in the same week? Are the ratings suspiciously uniform? Does every review sound like the same person wrote it? Buyers notice when a review section looks manufactured. The audit tells you if yours does.

Example from a real audit (anonymized): "23 of 47 reviews arrived in an 11-day window. That pattern looks manufactured. A skeptical first-time buyer will notice."

The methodology behind the scores

90%
Human CRO expert scores your page 6.5, BuyerEyes scores it 6.5. A standard AI prompt scores it 8.2. Or 2.8. 6 to 8 times out of ten it's wrong.
150
Real examples of what good and bad look like, across 6 dimensions. Your score is measured against those, not invented.
29
Specific scores per audit, each with an explanation of what's good or bad
14
AI reviewers that check, challenge, and verify each other's work
Kamil Andrusz, founder of BuyerEyes

Built by Kamil Andrusz

30+ years in Internet infrastructure. From Linux/Unix systems in 1995 through security consulting for Lufthansa, telecom project management for Nokia (served millions of people!), to WooCommerce performance and conversion rate optimization and custom AI solutions. Master of Law. Certified Scrum Master. Likes facts, data and science. That's why the system behind BuyerEyes is built on published research and tested against real human expert judgments — to make your AI buyers act like human buyers.

Infrastructure since 1995 WooCommerce CRO AI/LLM systems WooSpeedUp.com

What our customers found in their reports

Honestly? I thought my site was doing its job. It loads fast, it looks clean, the story is there. So when BuyerEyes scored it 42 out of 100, my first reaction was "no way." Then I read the persona analysis, five simulated visitors, each with their own doubts and hesitations, and it clicked. People were landing on my page, getting interested, and then... bookmarking it. Not contacting me. Because my contact form was buried, my headline didn't explain what I actually do fast enough, and there was no clear next step on mobile. These aren't things you see when you stare at your own site every day. I needed an outside perspective, and BuyerEyes gave me exactly that.

Joanna Karjalainen
Joanna Karjalainen Founder, vetresor.se
Stripe-secured payments
GDPR compliant
Data deleted after delivery
Report in 24-72h or free
Scoring reaches 90% agreement with human CRO experts Built on published research Learn more

We test what we sell. Here are our own results.

Before asking you to trust BuyerEyes, we pointed it at our own site. Every score, every finding, every fix — published.

68 Overall
4.5 Trust
9.5 Copy
7.5 CTA
8.1 Technical

Score: 68/100. Trust: 4.5 out of 10 — and we know exactly why. The audit found missing contact info, no visible social proof, and three competing CTAs above the fold. Copy scored 9.5, but the page didn't feel safe to buy from. That's the point: this tool finds what you wouldn't see yourself.

We published the full report — every finding, every score, every persona reaction — and started fixing. Four rounds of changes so far, all documented.

Read the full case study

Want your site to be our next case study?

We'll audit your page and publish the results (with your permission). Full report, zero cost for the first 3 stores.

hello@buyereyes.ai

One page. One campaign. Your whole funnel.

Pick where you need clarity. Every tier tells you what's working, what's not, and what to fix first — in plain language you can act on today.

Buyer View
See your site through your buyers' eyes.
$49
24-48h delivery
  • 5 simulated buyers review your page
  • 1 page analyzed in depth
  • Visual attention map — see where visitors actually look
  • Detailed breakdown of what works and what to fix first
  • Prioritized fix list ranked by effort and impact
  • Plain-language summary you can act on today
  • Full technical report included

One-time payment. Report in ~24 hours.

Buyer Journey
They land. They see. They leave. See why.
$499
48-72h delivery
  • 10 simulated buyers across your full funnel
  • Up to 10 pages analyzed end-to-end
  • Up to 5 ad sets reviewed
  • Find where buyers drop off between steps
  • Full walkthrough of your buyer's path
  • Ad-to-page match check for each creative
  • Complete priority roadmap: what to fix and in what order
  • Competitor benchmark on your landing page
  • Plain-language summary + full technical report

One-time payment. Full funnel, start to finish.

100% Delivery Guarantee. If we don't deliver your report, you get a full refund. If you can't find at least 3 things to act on, email us for a free 30-minute walkthrough.

A CRO agency charges $2,000-5,000+ for one analyst's opinion over 2-4 weeks. You get multiple AI reviewers that challenge each other's findings, a detailed breakdown of every area of your page, and a plain-language summary your team can act on the same day. 24-72 hours depending on tier, starting at $49.

Know someone who could use this? Share your unique link after purchase — you earn $15 credit toward your next audit for every referral. No limits. Credits never expire.
Need a custom scope? Contact us for a tailored quote.
Stripe-secured payments
GDPR compliant
Data deleted after delivery
Report in 24-72h or free

Who is this NOT for?

01

You don't need your site to convert.

You prefer burning ad budget and hoping the landing page figures itself out. Fair enough. We're not for you.

02

You collect reports. You don't act on them.

BuyerEyes gives you a ranked list of what to fix. If that list is going to sit in your Downloads folder, save your $49.

03

You want someone to fix it for you.

BuyerEyes is a diagnostic tool. It tells you what's broken and in what order to fix it. The fixing part? That's on you and your team.

Before you buy

Those tools measure technical performance: load speed, layout shifts, accessibility scores. BuyerEyes measures conversion performance: whether your page convinces real buyer personas to act. A page can score 100 on Lighthouse and still lose 70% of prospects because the headline is confusing or trust signals are missing. We score what matters to revenue. That includes technical performance.
Most AI tools ask a model to rate your page 1-10. That approach agrees with human experts only about 30% of the time. BuyerEyes works differently: instead of asking for a number, the AI describes what it sees in plain language, and we compare that against 150 real examples of what good and bad actually look like. Result: 90% agreement with human CRO experts. The method is repeatable, stable, and based on published research. Full methodology
Buyer View and Buyer Click reports are delivered within 24-48 hours. Buyer Journey reports (up to 10 pages with full funnel simulation) take 48-72 hours. You receive both HTML and PDF versions.
Each recommendation comes with an effort tag (low, medium, high) and an impact tag. Start with low-effort, high-impact items. The report is structured so you can hand it directly to your development team or designer with clear "fix this, in this order" instructions.
Yes. The system performs cross-lingual evaluation. Buyer personas are generated in the language of the target audience, and the analysis accounts for cultural and linguistic context. We've audited sites in Polish, Swedish, English, and German.
Yes. Provide a one-line brief like "Polish admin workers, 45-55, budget-conscious" and we generate personas matched to your actual audience — 5 for Buyer View and Buyer Click, 10 for Buyer Journey. Or let the system pick the most relevant personas based on your page content and industry.
No. BuyerEyes is a diagnostic tool, not an agency. We tell you what to fix, in what order, and why it matters. You hand the report to your dev team or designer and they implement the changes. Each recommendation includes an effort tag so you know what takes 30 minutes and what takes a week.
After your purchase, you get a unique referral link. When someone buys through your link, you earn $15 in credit toward your next audit. No limits on how many people you refer. Credits never expire.
Most AI auditing tools send one model to read your page and return a generic score. BuyerEyes uses multiple AI reviewers, then checks whether they agree. When they disagree, the system keeps testing until the most important issues surface. Good scores get challenged for hidden weaknesses. Low scores get defended for overlooked strengths. What you receive survived internal scrutiny — not a single model's first impression. The scoring method reaches 90% agreement with human CRO experts. Every finding is specific enough to hand directly to your developer or designer.
Very detailed. Instead of one vague "your design needs work" score, you get specifics: "Your buy button is hard to find on mobile." "Your headline talks about you instead of your buyer." "Your reviews look manufactured." Each finding maps to a specific element your team can fix — no further interpretation needed.
The score is a starting point, not a verdict. Look at the per-dimension breakdown and per-persona reactions. A page can score 65 overall but have a 9.0 in copy and a 4.0 in trust. That contrast tells you exactly where to invest. The recommendations matter more than the number.
BuyerEyes uses a scoring method that reaches 90% agreement with human CRO experts — far above the ~30% that standard AI ratings achieve. That said, AI analysis is advisory. Use it to inform your decisions, not replace your judgment. Individual scores may vary slightly between runs. See how we validate accuracy

Every day without data is a day of guessing.

See what your buyers see. Find out what's stopping them from buying. Get a prioritized fix list your team can act on today. Report in 24-48h.

Get Your Report

From $49. Results in 24-72h. No account needed.

Get Your Report